The essays during this quantity have been written to have fun the 60th birthday of G. E. L. Owen, who by way of his essays and seminars on historical Greek philosophy has made a contribution to its learn that's moment to none. The authors, from either side of the Atlantic, comprise not just students whose major examine pursuits lie in Greek philosophy, yet others most sensible recognized for his or her paintings often philosophy. All are students or more youthful colleagues of Professor Owen who're indebted to his perform of philosophical scholarship as a first-order philosophical task. on the center of G. E. L. Owen's paintings has been a preoccupation with the function of philosophical mirrored image on language within the metaphysics and epistemology of Plato, Aristotle and different historical Greek thinkers. this is often for this reason the overall subject of the current quantity, inclusive of 5 papers on Plato's serious dialogues and 7 on Aristotle, prefaced by means of on Heraclitus and by way of a research of the controversy in Hellenistic philosophy at the sorites. this can be a publication for experts in Greek philosophy and philosophers of language for you to even be of curiosity to a couple linguists.
Read or Download Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen PDF
Similar Ancient Greece books
Aeschylus (525-456 BC) introduced a brand new grandeur and epic sweep to the drama of classical Athens, elevating it to the prestige of excessive paintings. The Persians, the single Greek tragedy to house occasions from fresh Athenian background, depicts the ultimate defeat of Persia within the conflict of Salamis, throughout the eyes of the Persian courtroom of King Xerxes, changing into a sad lesson in tyranny.
In comedy, chuffed endings get to the bottom of real-world conflicts. those conflicts, in flip, go away their mark at the texts within the kind of gaps in plot and inconsistencies of characterization. Greek Comedy and beliefs analyzes how the constitution of historic Greek comedy betrays and responds to cultural tensions within the society of the classical city-state.
This quantity examines cinematic representations of historical Greek girls from the nation-states of delusion and background. It discusses how those woman figures are resurrected at the monstrous display via assorted filmmakers in the course of diverse old moments, and are for that reason embedded inside of a story which serves quite a few reasons, counting on the director of the movie, its screenwriters, the studio, the rustic of its beginning, and the sociopolitical context on the time of its creation.
In contemporary many years literary methods to drama have improved: new historic, intertextual, political, performative and metatheatrical, socio-linguistic, gender-driven, transgenre-driven. New details has been accrued, occasionally via re-assessment of extant literary texts and fabric artifacts, at different instances from new discoveries from the fields of archaeology, epigraphy, artwork heritage, and literary experiences.
Extra resources for Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen
R. Hardie, A. research in Plato (Oxford 1936), William F. Lynch, An method of Plato's Metaphysics in the course of the Parmenides (Washington D. C. 1959). those I shall regularly seek advice from are: F. M. Cornford, Plato and Parmenides (London 1939); G. E. L. Owen, 'Notes on Ryle's Plato', in Ryle: a suite of serious Essays, ed. O. P. wooden and G. Pitcher (New York 1970); Gilbert Ryle, 'Plato's Parmenides', brain, forty eight (1939), 129-51, and 302-25 (reprinted in reviews in Plato's Metaphysics, ed. R. E. Allen (New York 1965), 97-147; all extra references could be to this printing); Malcolm Schofield, 'The Antinomies of Plato's Parmenides', Classical Quarterly, 27 (1977), 139—58. 136 JULIUS M. MORAVCSIK of content material. For something, after the second one argument we discover an extended passage on time which starts through pointing out that we're beginning for 'the 3rd time' (155E4); commentators, taking the outside constitution too heavily, were treating this as an 'appendix' to the second one argument. additional facts for the speculation that the over-all constitution isn't really intended very deeply is supplied by way of the truth that the arguments aren't of equivalent size. the second is the longest, and the final 4 take in less area than the 1st 4. (The first arguments occupy 137C via 155D whereas the final purely 164B via 166B. ) ultimately, no longer all the conclusions reached are both tricky. The conclusions in 161A-B approximately likeness and unlikeness should not paradoxical and nor is the realization approximately equality at 161E1-2. ultimately, the strain among the final arguments isn't precisely just like the single among the opposite pairs. there's facts from different dialogues that Plato will use an 'outer shell' to border an 'inner center' which really represents the genuine value of the discussion. for instance, the constitution of the Phaedo means that an important factor is the best way Socrates may still die, whereas in truth that factor seems to be posterior to the problems of the idea of the kinds and the declare for immortality. The constitution of the Sophist means that the most activity is to reach at an enough definition of sophistry, whereas crucial matters become the relationships among varieties and the research of falsehood. therefore one may perhaps glance past the mere structural advice of a chain of contradictory arguments, and search to discover what the genuine concerns are that Plato desires to concentrate on. certainly, the parallels among pairs of arguments divert our consciousness from an both major structural truth. The arguments are usually not providing purely conclusions which are unacceptable while thought of pair-wise. every one major argument ends up in conclusions which are through themselves logically unacceptable. For they both declare that given a suite of opposites during which each intelligible point may still take part - in quite a few methods - none of those will in reality characterise the topic of inquiry, or that each one of them do. to say yes entity is neither just like itself nor diverse from others, after which to say that the entity in query is either a similar and diverse from itself are both unacceptable conclusions.